Home  |  About us  |  Editorial board  |  Ahead of print  | Current issue  |  Archives  |  Submit article  |  Instructions |  Search  |   Subscribe  |  Advertise  |  Contacts  |  Login 
  Users Online: 1074Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

 Table of Contents      
FAQTUAL
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 117

Protocol deviation and violation


President, Clininvent Research Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India

Date of Web Publication5-Sep-2012

Correspondence Address:
Arun Bhatt
Clininvent Research Pvt. Ltd., A-103, Everest Chambers, Marol Naka, Andheri-Kurla Road, Andheri (East) - 400 059, Mumbai, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2229-3485.100663

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Bhatt A. Protocol deviation and violation. Perspect Clin Res 2012;3:117

How to cite this URL:
Bhatt A. Protocol deviation and violation. Perspect Clin Res [serial online] 2012 [cited 2023 Mar 30];3:117. Available from: http://www.picronline.org/text.asp?2012/3/3/117/100663


   What is the difference between protocol deviation and protocol violation? Top


Some suggested definitions are as follows:

Food and drug administration

Compliance Program Guidance Manual

Bioresearch monitoring clinical investigators

  • A protocol deviation/violation is generally an unplanned excursion from the protocol that is not implemented or intended as a systematic change
  • Protocol deviation is also used to refer to any other, unplanned, instance(s) of protocol noncompliance


EFGCP Audit Working Party 2001

  • Protocol violation: Serious non-compliance - may lead to exclusion of patients from eligibility analysis and/or their discontinuation from the study
  • Protocol deviation: Less serious non-compliance - may not render a patient ineligible


Norman M. Goldfarb Journal of Clinical Research Best Practices Nov 2005



  • Protocol deviation. A protocol deviation occurs when, without significant consequences, the activities on a study diverge from the Institutional Review Board-approved protocol, e.g., missing a visit window because the subject is traveling. Not as serious as a protocol violation.
  • Protocol violation. A divergence from the protocol that materially (a) reduces the quality or completeness of the data, (b) makes the Informed Consent Form inaccurate, or (c) impacts a subject's safety, rights, or welfare. Examples of protocol violations may include the following:
    • Inadequate or delinquent informed consent
    • Inclusion/exclusion criteria not met
    • Unreported serious adverse events
    • Improper breaking of the blind
    • Use of prohibited medication
    • Incorrect or missing tests
    • Mishandled samples
    • Multiple visits missed or outside permissible windows
    • Materially inadequate record keeping
    • Intentional deviation from protocol, Good Clinical Practice, or regulations by study personnel
    • Subject repeated non-compliance with study requirements




This article has been cited by
1 Revisiting the clinical trial history and regulatory mechanisms in Nepal in the context of COVID-19 pandemic
Suman Sharma Paudel, Yunima Sapkota, Pradip Gyanwali, Meghnath Dhimal, Namita Ghimire, Suman Pant, Dinesh Bhandari, Shrawan Kumar Mandal
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 2022; : 101038
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Scientific Ethical Integrity and Human Research Subjects Protections Non-compliance Remediation: Commentary on Practical Considerations and Implications
Ralph J Johnson, Ralph J Johnson, Raul Isea
Journal of Human Health Research. 2022; 1(3): 24
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 An Innovative Approach for the Development of an Early Phase Research Unit
Ruth Knecht, Toby Bressler
Practical Implementation of Nursing Science. 2022; 1(1): 6
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Unreported protocol deviations – The tip of the research-berg
Uma Kulkarni, Ravi Vaswani, Mohammed Guthigar, Nagapati Bhat, Laxminarayan Sonde
Perspectives in Clinical Research. 2022; 0(0): 0
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Bifrontal high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation is not effective as an add-on treatment in depression
Martin Schecklmann,Vahid Nejati,Timm B. Poeppl,Juliette Peytard,Rainer Rupprecht,Thomas C. Wetter,Berthold Langguth,Peter M. Kreuzer
Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2021; 132: 116
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Text Classification for Clinical Trial Operations: Evaluation and Comparison of Natural Language Processing Techniques
Emma Richard,Bhargava Reddy
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Does propolis affect the quality of life and complications in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (diagnosed with Rome IV criteria)? A study protocol of the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial
Mahsa Miryan,Pezhman Alavinejad,Mohammadreza Abbaspour,Davood Soleimani,Alireza Ostadrahimi
Trials. 2020; 21(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Regular Mindful Yoga Practice as a Method to Improve Androgen Levels in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Vishesha Patel,Heather Menezes,Christian Menezes,Stephanie Bouwer,Chevelta A. Bostick-Smith,Diana L. Speelman
The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Evaluating probiotics for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a randomised placebo-controlled multicentre trial protocol and statistical analysis plan for PROSPECT
Jennie Johnstone,Diane Heels-Ansdell,Lehana Thabane,Maureen Meade,John Marshall,Francois Lauzier,Erick Huaileigh Duan,Nicole Zytaruk,Daphnee Lamarche,Michael Surette,Deborah J Cook
BMJ Open. 2019; 9(6): e025228
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Investigation of the Study Characteristics Affecting Clinical Trial Quality Using the Protocol Deviations Leading to Exclusion of Subjects From the Per Protocol Set Data in Studies for New Drug Application: A Retrospective Analysis
Norihito Kohara,Masayuki Kaneko,Mamoru Narukawa
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2019; 53(1): 45
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 So You Want to Be a Principal Investigator
Mansoor Saleh,Gurudatta Naik
Journal of Oncology Practice. 2018; 14(6): e384
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Protocol adherence for continuously titrated interventions in randomized trials: an overview of the current methodology and case study
F. Lauzier,N. K. Adhikari,A. Seely,K. K. Y. Koo,E. P. Belley-Côté,K. E. A. Burns,D. J. Cook,F. D’Aragon,B. Rochwerg,M. E. Kho,S. J. W. Oczkowksi,E. H. Duan,M. O. Meade,A. G. Day,F. Lamontagne
BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2017; 17(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Clinical Trial Amendments: Development of a Process for Consistent Implementation?
Gretchen McNally,Amanda Hrnicek,Hallie Barr
Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2017; 21(5): 627
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Surveillance of protocol deviations in Japanese oncology registration trials: a single institute experience
Shinsuke Sasada,Nobuko Ushirozawa,Noriko Kobayashi,Yutaka Fujiwara,Kenji Tamura,Noboru Yamamoto
Investigational New Drugs. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    What is the diff...

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed7814    
    Printed177    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded1942    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 14    

Recommend this journal